hakimisport

Blog

  • VAR DECISIONS UNDER SCRUTINY AS PREMIER LEAGUE CLARIFIES CALLS IN NOTTINGHAM FOREST’S WIN OVER RELEGATION-THREATENED WEST HAM

    VAR DECISIONS UNDER SCRUTINY AS PREMIER LEAGUE CLARIFIES CALLS IN NOTTINGHAM FOREST’S WIN OVER RELEGATION-THREATENED WEST HAM

    West Ham United’s battle for Premier League survival took a dramatic and controversial turn as VAR decisions dominated the aftermath of their damaging defeat to Nottingham Forest at the London Stadium.

    A match already loaded with relegation pressure was overshadowed by two major VAR interventions, both of which went in Forest’s favour and left West Ham players, staff, and supporters furious. As boos echoed around the stadium at full-time, the sense among Hammers fans was clear: this was a result shaped as much by technology as by football.

    The first flashpoint came when West Ham were denied what many believed was a legitimate penalty, a decision that sparked immediate outrage in the stands. Replays appeared to show clear contact, yet VAR ruled no clear and obvious error, allowing play to continue. Moments later, Forest capitalised—turning frustration into punishment.

    Tempers flared further following a second contentious decision involving a potential foul in the build-up to Forest’s decisive moment. Again, VAR reviewed the incident and again sided against West Ham, deepening the feeling of injustice among the home support.

    With West Ham now drifting dangerously close to the relegation zone, the Premier League was forced to issue a public explanation, confirming that VAR officials believed the on-field decisions met the threshold required by protocol. That explanation did little to calm anger, with fans branding the outcome “unacceptable” and “damaging” at such a critical stage of the season.

    Nottingham Forest, meanwhile, walked away with three invaluable points that could prove decisive in their own survival push—though even some neutral observers admitted the controversy overshadowed their performance.

    For West Ham, the consequences are severe. Confidence is shaken, pressure is mounting, and questions are being asked not just of players and management, but of the system itself. With every point now crucial, the feeling among supporters is that VAR may have played a decisive role in their relegation fight.

    As the Premier League season reaches its most unforgiving phase, one thing is certain: this match will be remembered not for the football, but for the decisions that left an entire fanbase stunned—and fearing the worst.

  • NEW ANGLE EMERGES OF AREOLA PENALTY INCIDENT AND IT CHANGES ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING

    NEW ANGLE EMERGES OF AREOLA PENALTY INCIDENT AND IT CHANGES ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING

    In what was already shaping up to be one of the most dramatic relegation battles of the Premier League season, one controversial decision in the final moments of West Ham vs Nottingham Forest didn’t just determine three points — it now threatens to reshape the narrative around referee intervention, VAR interpretation, and Alphonse Areola’s precarious standing at the London Stadium.

    A High-Stakes Clash in the Relegation Scrap
    On Tuesday night, West Ham United hosted Nottingham Forest in a crucial relegation six-pointer. West Ham took an early advantage courtesy of a 13th-minute own goal from Murillo, only for Forest to fight back through a 55th-minute header by Nicolás Domínguez. With the score level deep into the final stages, tension rippled through the stadium — only for a moment of drama to completely alter the outcome.

    The Incident: Areola, Gibbs-White, and VAR’s Final Word
    In the 89th minute, Forest forward Morgan Gibbs-White found himself tangled with West Ham goalkeeper Alphonse Areola as the latter attempted to punch clear a dangerous ball into the box. On first glance, and even on initial television replays, the collision looked minimal, with defenders and attackers clustered tightly and bodies moving in close proximity.

    But then came the pivotal moment: VAR intervened, prompting referee Tony Harrington to review the incident at the pitchside monitor. After a lengthy check, a penalty was awarded to Nottingham Forest — a decision that Morgan Gibbs-White duly converted to complete Forest’s comeback.

    Why the New Angle Changes Everything
    Here’s where things get controversial.
    1. Reexamination of Contact Severity
    A fresh angle circulating online — drawn from fan uploads and detailed frame analyses — shows Areola’s punch may have contacted Gibbs-White earlier than recognised by the on-field referee, but not with the force typically associated with a foul. Critics argue that minimal shoulder and arm contact should not meet the threshold for a direct free-kick offence according to Law 12 of the game, suggesting the VAR decision leaned on technicality rather than clear and obvious error.

    2. Areola’s Positioning Has Been Misread
    Most broadcast angles showed Areola in mid-air with his arm extended — a moment that looked reckless. But the new viewpoint reveals that Gibbs-White was already committed to the header, with his own momentum carrying him into Areola’s arm. This nuance, often missed in live coverage, may explain why some pundits now claim the penalty should not have stood. Observers argue that the on-field referee may have conflated aerial collision with contact deserving a spot kick.

    3. VAR’s Controversial Role Resurfaces a Larger Issue
    The decision reignites the ongoing debate over VAR thresholds: should 50-50 aerial challenges where contact is incidental be subject to reversal, or should VAR intervene only where there is clear and obvious error? This argument mirrors other high-profile VAR controversies across football where technological checks have overruled on-field calls despite ambiguous contact.

    Tactical and Psychological Ripples Across Both Squads
    The penalty not only handed Forest all three points — a 2-1 victory that takes them seven points clear of the drop — but also deepened West Ham’s struggles. After an already extended winless run in the league, this late twist compounded frustrations for manager Nuno Espírito Santo and his squad.

    From Forest’s perspective, the goal was nothing short of a lifeline — a dramatic twist that keeps their survival hopes alive. For West Ham, the controversy surrounding Areola’s involvement now overshadows what had been a competitive performance.

    Fan Reactions: Split Down the Middle
    Social media has erupted in the aftermath:
    Forest supporters see a justified intervention that corrects what the replays clearly show — significant contact warranting a penalty.
    West Ham fans and neutral analysts argue that the new angle actually lessens the perceived contact, suggesting VAR penalised a goalkeeper making a genuine attempt to claim the ball.
    Pundits now question whether VAR’s influence in such tight aerial duels does more harm than good, muddying what should be a straightforward interpretation of Law 12.
    Conclusion: A Penalty That Could Have Broader Repercussions
    What started as a pivotal relegation fixture has escalated into a flashpoint in the broader VAR debate. The emerging angle on the Areola incident doesn’t just reignite old arguments — it forces football’s authorities and fans alike to scrutinise how and when technology should shape match-deciding moments.
    With West Ham’s season now at an inflection point and Areola at the centre of dissected footage from multiple angles, this decision will be debated, analysed, and referenced in VAR discussions for weeks — if not months — to come.

  • WILFRED NANCY BREAKS SILENCE WITH SHOCKING STATEMENT AFTER CELTIC SACKING

    WILFRED NANCY BREAKS SILENCE WITH SHOCKING STATEMENT AFTER CELTIC SACKING

    In what has rapidly become one of the most startling managerial sagas in recent Scottish football history, Wilfried Nancy has emerged from the fallout of his abrupt dismissal by Celtic Football Club with a statement that has set social and sporting discourse ablaze. The developments surrounding Nancy’s tenure, dismissal, and subsequent public remarks reveal not only the intense pressures faced by managers at elite clubs but also the complex interplay between tactical philosophy, fan expectations, and institutional decision-making.
    A Short-Lived Reign Ends Abruptly
    Wilfried Nancy’s appointment as Celtic manager in early December 2025 was initially framed as a bold new chapter for the Scottish champions. The club secured Nancy on a two-and-a-half-year deal after his successful stint in Major League Soccer, notably winning the MLS Cup and other honours with Columbus Crew, and being recognised as one of the league’s most promising coaches.

    However, what unfolded in the ensuing weeks was a dramatic downturn in results and confidence. Over the course of just eight games, Nancy’s side secured only two victories while succumbing to six defeats across all competitions — a run that included a humiliating 3–1 loss to fierce rivals Rangers in the Old Firm derby.

    The club’s hierarchy, already under scrutiny following the departure of previous manager Brendan Rodgers, acted decisively. On 5 January 2026, Celtic announced that Nancy’s contract had been terminated with immediate effect — a decision that resulted in the shortest managerial tenure in the club’s 138-year history.

    Contextualising the Collapse
    To understand the ferocity of the reaction to Nancy’s tenure, it is essential to place the sacking within the broader competitive and cultural landscape of Scottish football. Celtic, as one of the nation’s dominant clubs, carries an expectation of domestic success and European competitiveness. Under Nancy, the team’s defensive frailties were on stark display: they conceded goals at an alarming rate, failed to maintain clean sheets, and saw a familiar league cushion shrink amid rising pressure from rivals.

    Beyond mere results, Nancy’s tactical overhaul — a transition toward a 3-4-3 formation — was interpreted by many observers as ill-fitted to the existing squad, particularly given the lack of a meaningful pre-season for integration. Critics argued that the squad’s composition did not align with the higher defensive line and positional demands inherent in his system, creating mismatches and structural vulnerabilities that opponents ruthlessly exploited.

    Moreover, the tactical regression was compounded by fan unrest and external pressure. Supporters staged protests outside Celtic Park following the Rangers defeat, highlighting their dissatisfaction not only with the results but also with the decision-making of the club board in hiring Nancy in the first place.

    The Shocking Statement: Nancy Speaks Out
    Amid the aftermath of his dismissal, Wilfried Nancy granted a rare statement that has rapidly circulated across media and supporter circles. In a detailed press release, he appeared to level critique not just at his own firing but at aspects of the professional environment and expectations that he felt had undermined his project before it could take hold.
    Nancy’s core assertions included:
    Challenges of Transitional Leadership: He contended that inheriting a squad mid-season, without a preparatory training period or transfer window support, significantly impeded his ability to implement systemic changes effectively.
    Perceived Mismatch in Expectations: He emphasised that Celtic’s leadership and fan base did not grant a “reasonable adaptation period” for his tactical philosophy — a claim that sparked debate about the limits of managerial patience at elite clubs.
    Reflection on Football Culture: Nancy’s statement further elaborated on the intense scrutiny and emotional volatility in European football environments, suggesting that short-term results often overshadow long-term strategy and player development.
    While some pundits saw these claims as defiant and self-justifying, others interpreted them as pointing to deeper structural issues within clubs like Celtic, where immediate success is often mandated regardless of contextual constraints.
    Reactions from the Football Community
    Nancy’s public remarks have elicited a spectrum of reactions:
    Supporters of Analytical Patience argued that his critique highlighted a broader misalignment in modern football between tactical innovation and managerial tenure security. They noted that historically, teams that undergo systemic transitions require time and structural backing, especially when competing on multiple fronts.
    Traditionalists and Pragmatists countered that in a results-driven environment, tactical infusion must deliver rapid improvements — especially at a club with Celtic’s expectations. For them, the outcomes under Nancy’s regime were simply untenable, irrespective of context or philosophy.
    Media and Former Professionals have weighed in with nuanced assessments, acknowledging both the pragmatism of Celtic’s board in seeking stability and the potential misstep in hiring and supporting a coach whose footballing identity diverged sharply from the short-term demands of the season.
    Aftermath: A Club in Flux
    In the wake of Nancy’s exit, Celtic moved swiftly to reappoint Martin O’Neill as interim manager — a familiar figure with an established legacy at the club. O’Neill’s return has been framed as an effort to steady the ship and restore winning momentum amid a congested fixture list and mounting external pressure.

    Celtic’s internal dynamics — from transfer policy to tactical continuity — have now become central talking points for analysts and supporters alike. Questions abound: Can the club stabilise its identity and results? Did the board make a strategic error in hiring Nancy without sufficient transition planning? These debates are likely to persist as Celtic navigates the remainder of the season.
    Concluding Reflections
    Wilfried Nancy’s tenure at Celtic, though brief, has catalysed intensive introspection across the football world regarding managerial agency, club expectations, and the volatile nature of elite sports leadership. His “shocking statement” — by challenging conventional narratives around his dismissal — has underscored the broader tensions between innovation and tradition, patience and performance, and philosophy and pragmatism in contemporary football.
    As the season unfolds, the lessons from this episode will continue to influence discussions about leadership, accountability, and the structural dynamics of club management in the modern game

  • SHOCK AT WOLVES: FANS IN DISBELIEF AS STAR PLAYER SUFFERS SERIOUS BREAKDOWN IN TRAINING, EVERTON CLASH IN DOUBT

    SHOCK AT WOLVES: FANS IN DISBELIEF AS STAR PLAYER SUFFERS SERIOUS BREAKDOWN IN TRAINING, EVERTON CLASH IN DOUBT

    Wolverhampton Wanderers have been rocked by a major scare after one of their star players suffered a serious breakdown during a routine training session, throwing preparations for the upcoming clash against Everton into chaos.
    The incident reportedly occurred late in the session, with teammates and coaching staff immediately concerned as the player was unable to continue. Medical staff rushed to assess the situation, and the session was quickly adjusted as uncertainty spread across the training ground.
    While the club has yet to release an official medical update, early indications suggest the issue is significant enough to place the player’s availability for the Everton match in serious doubt. The news has sent shockwaves through the Wolves fanbase, with supporters expressing concern and frustration ahead of a crucial fixture.
    The setback comes at a difficult time for Wolves, who have been relying heavily on the player’s influence, leadership, and consistency this season. Losing such a key figure — even temporarily — would be a major blow to the team’s plans and could force the manager into late tactical changes.
    Everton, meanwhile, will be watching developments closely as Wolves await further assessments. A final decision on the player’s involvement is expected closer to matchday, depending on medical advice and recovery progress.
    For now, Wolves fans can only hope for positive news, as anxiety grows around one of the most anticipated fixtures on the calendar.

  • CELTIC FANS STUNNED AS HEAD COACH WILFRED NANCY IS SACKED WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT AS BOARD REASONS EMERGE

    CELTIC FANS STUNNED AS HEAD COACH WILFRED NANCY IS SACKED WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT AS BOARD REASONS EMERGE

    Celtic supporters have been left in total disbelief after the club confirmed the immediate dismissal of head coach Wilfred Nancy, bringing a sudden and dramatic end to his time at Parkhead.

    The decision, announced by the Celtic board on Monday, comes amid growing internal concerns over recent performances and long-term direction, despite public backing of the coach in previous weeks. Club officials described the move as “necessary and decisive,” signalling a loss of confidence behind the scenes.

    According to sources close to the board, the sacking was driven by a combination of inconsistent results, tactical disagreements, and mounting pressure within the dressing room. While Celtic remain competitive domestically, the board is understood to have been dissatisfied with the team’s recent trajectory and perceived lack of progress in key areas.

    In a brief statement, Celtic said:

    “The club has taken the difficult decision to part ways with Wilfred Nancy with immediate effect. We thank him for his professionalism and commitment and wish him well in the future.”

    Fans reacted with shock across social media, with many questioning both the timing of the decision and the lack of warning signs. Some supporters expressed frustration at what they see as instability at the top, while others acknowledged the pressure that comes with managing a club of Celtic’s stature.

    Assistant coaches are expected to take charge on an interim basis as the club begins the search for a replacement. The board has reportedly already drawn up a shortlist, with an emphasis on experience, strong leadership, and immediate impact.

    More clarity is expected in the coming days as Celtic look to steady the ship and refocus on their domestic and European ambitions.

  • STATEMENT WHY WILFRIED NANCY WAS SACKED, REASON HAS GOT EVERYONE ON THE EDGE AS FANS DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT FROM CLUB

    STATEMENT WHY WILFRIED NANCY WAS SACKED, REASON HAS GOT EVERYONE ON THE EDGE AS FANS DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT FROM CLUB

    CLUB RELEASE OFFICIAL STATEMENT WHY WILFRIED NANCY WAS SACKED, REASON HAS GOT EVERYONE ON THE EDGE AS FANS DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT FROM CLUB
    In a move that has sent shockwaves rippling through the football world, the club has officially confirmed the dismissal of head coach Wilfried Nancy, releasing a carefully worded statement that has only deepened the mystery rather than providing clarity. What was expected to be a straightforward explanation has instead ignited widespread debate, panic, and speculation among supporters, pundits, and insiders alike.

    Wilfried Nancy, widely regarded as one of the most progressive and tactically astute managers in recent seasons, had been praised for his innovative philosophy, fearless approach to big matches, and commitment to developing young talent. Under his leadership, the club experienced periods of exhilarating football, record-breaking performances, and a renewed sense of identity. That is precisely why this sudden decision has left fans stunned and scrambling for answers.

    THE STATEMENT THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING

    In the official statement released earlier today, the club cited “a divergence in long-term sporting vision and operational alignment” as the primary reason for Nancy’s dismissal. While the words appeared calm and professional on the surface, they raised more questions than answers.

    The phrase “long-term sporting vision” immediately caught the attention of fans. Many interpreted it as a sign of internal conflict at the highest level of the club, suggesting that Nancy’s plans for the future may have clashed with the ambitions—or financial priorities—of the board. The mention of “operational alignment” only added fuel to the fire, hinting at behind-the-scenes disagreements that were never visible to the public.

    Rather than calming the fanbase, the statement sparked confusion and anxiety. Supporters took to social media within minutes, dissecting every line and punctuation mark, desperate to understand what truly went wrong.

    TIMING THAT MAKES NO SENSE

    What has made the situation even more unsettling is the timing of the decision. The club is at a critical stage of the season, with important fixtures looming and squad morale hanging in the balance. Many fans argue that, regardless of internal disagreements, sacking Nancy at this point risks undoing months—if not years—of progress.

    Players are reportedly shocked by the news, with several senior figures said to have enjoyed a strong working relationship with the manager. Training ground sources suggest the decision came suddenly, leaving little time for emotional or tactical preparation. This has only intensified fears that the club may be heading into a period of instability.

    FANS LEFT ON EDGE AND IN THE DARK

    Perhaps the most damaging aspect of this saga is the uncertainty it has created. The club did not announce an immediate replacement, nor did it provide a clear roadmap for what comes next. For supporters, this silence is deafening.

    Some fear the club is preparing for a complete overhaul—one that could see key players sold, youth projects abandoned, and a more conservative footballing approach adopted. Others believe the board is gambling on a high-profile appointment that could redefine the club’s identity overnight. Either way, the lack of transparency has left fans feeling disconnected and uneasy.

    WHAT REALLY HAPPENED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?

    While the official line points to philosophical differences, speculation continues to swirl around deeper issues. Was there tension over transfer policy? Did Nancy push for more control over recruitment? Were there disagreements over youth development versus short-term results? None of these questions have been answered, and that vacuum has been filled with rumors, leaks, and conflicting reports.

    Former players and analysts have weighed in, many expressing disbelief that a manager of Nancy’s caliber could be dismissed without a clear footballing failure to justify it. Several have warned that the club risks alienating its fanbase if it does not address concerns quickly and honestly.

    WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

    As the dust begins to settle, one thing is clear: the club now stands at a crossroads. The next appointment will not just be about results—it will be a statement of intent. Fans want to know what the club represents, where it is heading, and whether Wilfried Nancy’s dismissal was part of a bold master plan or a disastrous miscalculation.

    Until those answers arrive, supporters remain on edge, bracing themselves for the unknown. One era has ended abruptly, and a new one is about to begin—but right now, nobody seems to know what to expect next.

  • TRANSFER SHOCKWAVE: RANGERS FANS STUNNED AND FURIOUS AS CELTIC LAUNCH LAST-MINUTE HIJACK OF NEAR-SEALED ITALIAN DEAL

    TRANSFER SHOCKWAVE: RANGERS FANS STUNNED AND FURIOUS AS CELTIC LAUNCH LAST-MINUTE HIJACK OF NEAR-SEALED ITALIAN DEAL

    Rangers have suffered a late setback in the transfer market after Celtic moved swiftly to hijack a deal that had been progressing towards completion, sources have told Sky Sports.

    The Ibrox club had been in advanced negotiations with the Italian side and were increasingly confident of securing the player’s signature, with discussions over personal terms understood to be well advanced. A breakthrough was expected before Celtic entered the picture late in the process.

    Celtic’s intervention came at a crucial stage, with the Parkhead club presenting an improved proposal that ultimately proved decisive. The player is now expected to complete the formalities ahead of a move to Glasgow’s east end, pending final paperwork.

    Rangers are understood to be disappointed by the outcome, having believed they were close to concluding the deal. The late twist has prompted frustration among supporters, who had anticipated an announcement in the coming days.

    From Celtic’s perspective, the move highlights their intent to strengthen the squad ahead of the new campaign, while also preventing a potential reinforcement for their Old Firm rivals. The club has remained active in the market and continues to assess further targets.

    Neither Rangers nor Celtic have made an official comment, but the Italian club involved is believed to have accepted Celtic’s revised offer following rapid talks in the early hours of Monday, January 5, 2026..

    The episode underlines the fine margins involved in modern transfer negotiations, particularly in the context of the Old Firm rivalry, where competition extends beyond the pitch and into the market.

  • “NEVER AGAIN” — DANNY ROHL CONFIRMS TWO SHOCK PLAYERS WON’T PLAY FOR THE CLUB AGAIN AS THEY ARE SET FOR JANUARY EXIT, NOBODY WOULD’VE EXPECTED

    “NEVER AGAIN” — DANNY ROHL CONFIRMS TWO SHOCK PLAYERS WON’T PLAY FOR THE CLUB AGAIN AS THEY ARE SET FOR JANUARY EXIT, NOBODY WOULD’VE EXPECTED

    “Never again.” Those were the striking words attributed to Danny Röhl as he delivered one of the most ruthless decisions of his tenure, confirming that two senior players will not feature for the club again and are now set for January exits in a development that has stunned supporters and pundits alike.

    The statement came after a tense internal review following recent performances and off-field issues that have reportedly tested Röhl’s patience. While the German coach stopped short of publicly naming the individuals in his immediate remarks, sources close to the club have since indicated that the decision is final and irreversible, with both players already informed that they are no longer part of the manager’s plans.

    Röhl, who has built a reputation for discipline, intensity, and a clear footballing identity, is understood to have reached breaking point after what he viewed as repeated breaches of standards. Speaking candidly, the manager made it clear that talent alone is not enough to secure a place under his leadership, stressing that commitment, attitude, and professionalism are non-negotiable.

    “This club has values,” Röhl is believed to have told those within the dressing room. “If you cannot meet them every day, then you cannot represent us. Never again means never again.”

    The shock surrounding the decision stems largely from the profiles of the players involved. Both have been regular contributors in recent seasons and, at different points, were considered important figures within the squad. One is said to be a seasoned campaigner with leadership experience, while the other is a technically gifted player many fans expected to play a key role in the second half of the campaign. Their sudden fall from favour has therefore raised eyebrows and sparked intense debate.

    Behind the scenes, however, the move has been coming. Insiders suggest Röhl has grown increasingly frustrated with what he perceives as a lack of tactical discipline and a failure to fully buy into his high-energy approach. Training ground standards have reportedly been a particular concern, with the manager demanding absolute intensity in every session.

    January now looms as the inevitable exit point. The club is actively working with representatives to find suitable destinations, with both permanent transfers and loan deals being explored. Given their experience and pedigree, interest is expected from both domestic and overseas clubs, and negotiations could move quickly once the window opens.

    For supporters, the news has been met with mixed reactions. Some have expressed disappointment at seeing familiar faces pushed out so abruptly, questioning whether the situation could have been handled differently. Others, however, have applauded Röhl’s firmness, viewing the decision as a sign of strong leadership and a refusal to compromise on standards.

    What is clear is that the manager is sending a powerful message to the rest of the squad. No player, regardless of reputation or past contributions, is bigger than the club or immune from consequences. With the season entering a crucial phase, Röhl appears determined to streamline his group and ensure every individual is fully aligned with his vision.

    The decision may also have implications for January recruitment. By moving on two established players, the club will free up both squad space and wages, potentially allowing Röhl to bring in reinforcements better suited to his system. Fans can now expect a busy and possibly transformative transfer window.

    Ultimately, Röhl’s “never again” declaration may come to define this chapter of his reign. It is a gamble, but one rooted in conviction. If results improve and performances follow, the shock exits will be remembered as a turning point. If not, questions will inevitably be asked. For now, though, the message is unmistakable: under Danny Röhl, standards are everything, and there are no second chances.

  • FIVE HUGE TAKEAWAYS AS RANGERS DEEPENED WILFRIED NANCY’S CELTIC NIGHTMARE TO A NEW EXTREME.

    FIVE HUGE TAKEAWAYS AS RANGERS DEEPENED WILFRIED NANCY’S CELTIC NIGHTMARE TO A NEW EXTREME.

    Celtic have lost their sixth game in eight under Wilfried Nancy after a barely believable collapse against Rangers.

    Things got ugly in the stadium as the game turned on its head after the break, and Celtic did not look like getting back into the game for one second.

    An outstanding goal from Yang Hyun-Jun marked a positive first-half… but Youssef Chermiti scored two (yes, two) quickfire goals at the beginning of the second, before Mikey Moore added a third.

    This has left Celtic level on points with Rangers, a scenario unthinkable a few months ago.

    Five things we learned in Celtic 1-3 Rangers

    A staggering drop-off at half-time

    The two halves of football were polar opposites.

    In the first, Celtic suffocated Rangers with a positive performance in-possession. Against the ball, they pressed high and put the visitors under pressure.

    In the second, the Hoops simply did not respond from the setback of an equaliser – this has become far too much of a theme this season.

    A new low for Wilfried Nancy

    A feeling of pessimism regarding this fixture swept over the support after Tuesday’s defeat against Motherwell, and persisted despite a positive first-half today.

    Danny Röhl Sends Firm Warning to Celtic Coach Wilfried Nancy Over Comments About Fan-Favorite Youssef Chermiti

    Sheffield Wednesday manager Danny Röhl has reportedly issued a firm warning to Celtic head coach Wilfried Nancy following controversial remarks made about fan-favorite striker Youssef Chermiti after Celtic’s 3–1 defeat to Rangers.

    The Old Firm loss was a frustrating evening for Celtic, who struggled to impose themselves for long periods of the match. Emotions were clearly running high after the final whistle, and Wilfried Nancy’s post-match interview quickly became a major talking point among supporters and pundits alike.

    During his media appearance, Nancy appeared to single out Chermiti for criticism, questioning the forward’s contribution and decision-making in a way many fans felt was unfair and unnecessarily harsh. Chermiti, who has built a strong connection with the Celtic support through his work rate and commitment, has been one of the more popular figures in the squad despite the team’s inconsistent form.

    The comments sparked an immediate backlash on social media, with supporters defending the young striker and calling for the manager to show greater responsibility when addressing individual players in public.

    Danny Röhl, who is known for his strong stance on player welfare and man-management, is understood to have taken issue with Nancy’s remarks. Sources close to the situation suggest Röhl sent a clear message to the Celtic coach, warning that public criticism of players—especially in moments of high emotion—can damage confidence, dressing-room unity, and long-term development.

    Röhl has previously spoken about the importance of protecting players, particularly younger talents, from unnecessary pressure. His reported intervention has been praised by many within the football community, who see it as a reminder that leadership extends beyond tactics and results.

    While Wilfried Nancy has yet to respond publicly to the reaction, there is growing expectation that he may seek to clarify or soften his comments ahead of Celtic’s next fixture. With tensions already high following the Rangers defeat, the situation has added another layer of scrutiny to Celtic’s season.

    For Youssef Chermiti, the support from fans—and the wider message sent by figures like Röhl—may prove crucial as he looks to bounce back and focus on his performances on the pitch rather than the noise surrounding him.

    As the season progresses, how Nancy handles his squad and media responsibilities could be just as important as results, especially in a club where passion, scrutiny, and expectations are always intense.

  • DANNY RÖHL ISSUES STARK WARNING TO CELTIC BOSS WILFRIED NANCY AFTER SHOCK COMMENTS ABOUT FANS’ BELOVED STAR

    DANNY RÖHL ISSUES STARK WARNING TO CELTIC BOSS WILFRIED NANCY AFTER SHOCK COMMENTS ABOUT FANS’ BELOVED STAR

    Danny Röhl Sends Firm Warning to Celtic Coach Wilfried Nancy Over Comments About Fan-Favorite Youssef Chermiti

    Sheffield Wednesday manager Danny Röhl has reportedly issued a firm warning to Celtic head coach Wilfried Nancy following controversial remarks made about fan-favorite striker Youssef Chermiti after Celtic’s 3–1 defeat to Rangers.

    The Old Firm loss was a frustrating evening for Celtic, who struggled to impose themselves for long periods of the match. Emotions were clearly running high after the final whistle, and Wilfried Nancy’s post-match interview quickly became a major talking point among supporters and pundits alike.

    During his media appearance, Nancy appeared to single out Chermiti for criticism, questioning the forward’s contribution and decision-making in a way many fans felt was unfair and unnecessarily harsh. Chermiti, who has built a strong connection with the Celtic support through his work rate and commitment, has been one of the more popular figures in the squad despite the team’s inconsistent form.

    The comments sparked an immediate backlash on social media, with supporters defending the young striker and calling for the manager to show greater responsibility when addressing individual players in public.

    Danny Röhl, who is known for his strong stance on player welfare and man-management, is understood to have taken issue with Nancy’s remarks. Sources close to the situation suggest Röhl sent a clear message to the Celtic coach, warning that public criticism of players—especially in moments of high emotion—can damage confidence, dressing-room unity, and long-term development.

    Röhl has previously spoken about the importance of protecting players, particularly younger talents, from unnecessary pressure. His reported intervention has been praised by many within the football community, who see it as a reminder that leadership extends beyond tactics and results.

    While Wilfried Nancy has yet to respond publicly to the reaction, there is growing expectation that he may seek to clarify or soften his comments ahead of Celtic’s next fixture. With tensions already high following the Rangers defeat, the situation has added another layer of scrutiny to Celtic’s season.

    For Youssef Chermiti, the support from fans—and the wider message sent by figures like Röhl—may prove crucial as he looks to bounce back and focus on his performances on the pitch rather than the noise surrounding him.

    As the season progresses, how Nancy handles his squad and media responsibilities could be just as important as results, especially in a club where passion, scrutiny, and expectations are always intense.